chip ๐Ÿ”’
the only protocol-centric affixes iโ€™ve ever had on my domains were either โ€˜irc.โ€™ or โ€˜mail.โ€™ (and for a long time mail.teleri.net had an HTTP interface!). iโ€™ve always thought the http was implied by reachability on port 80/443. www is such a weird anachronism
1 4
chip ๐Ÿ”’
imagine if we had something like 8192 or so well known services that mapped to specific ports. we could put them in a file and just ship it in the OS. it would be so wild
1 5