(of course, i’m not too serious, and i’m also not a web dev, and i do realise not everything would move to server side, but i do think there’s value in one api all apps share?)
2 3i mean i guess it’s similar to inventing a new service, “app view view”, that talks html (or similar) and not atproto, but i guess the “problem” is that when you are running both the app view and the app view view, it’s unnecessary overhead to have the app view view actually talk to the app view
2 3yep and in fact we were considering making such a service anyway (backend-for-frontend architecture). It’s actually way less overhead since if we run app logic in the rack right next to the appview it’s ultra low latency, we’re able to cut down waterfalls and give the client exactly what it needs
2 5Samuel
@samuel.fm
this is for hyper-specific app concerns where we’d like the freedom to iterate fast and make lots of breaking changes. also, it’d unlock RSCs!!!
1