Samuel
Bluesky’s social-app doesn’t use any global state manager (redux/zustand/jotai/mobx etc). Why is that? 🧵 an elaboration on this post:
Samuel@samuel.fm· 11 Aug 2025
the problem I have is that it changes global state from a last resort to a first resort. thus the lowest effort solution always turns into a nightmare mess instead of being isolated and composable
5 12 83
Samuel
What we do use: - plain old React context - @tanstack.com query Having used React context at scale… I have to say the react team was cooking once again. Yet another case of weird ergonomics pushing you to work in a good way. Hoisting state to context being a bit of a PITA is a feature, not a bug!
1 20
Samuel
Adding more and more to an enormous app means by and large, stuff gets implemented in the lowest friction way. This is where composition shines. You want state to be as local as humanly possible, so it doesn’t get everywhere.
1 14
Samuel
Global state managers on the other hand have the opposite effect. The lowest friction path becomes making your stuff global. This does not scale well at all, and becomes increasingly incomprehensible.
1 15
Samuel
The key with using Context correctly is to only put one thing in them at a time. Got two things? Use two contexts. The danger zone is when you start putting large bundles of stuff in there, like you would a global state manager. This is obviously gonna make your whole app rerender.
2 16
Samuel
My heuristic is to only bundle stuff into an object when it’s stuff that isn’t gonna change: functions, for example. We have a useNonReactiveCallback hook which is great for this. This means you’re not gonna cause a rerender.
1 8
Samuel
Then if you’ve got values that might change, put em in their own context. This means they won’t trigger rerenders of anything that doesn’t need them. I messed this up recently: the controls that opens the dialogs has the functions in an object from context. The mistake was I got lazy and needed…
1 6
Samuel
to also pass down an internal value to another component, so I stuck it in the same object. This value changes every time you open a dialog, so even though it’s only *used* in one place it gets *consumed* in many many places, triggering unnecessary renders. This is such an easy fix: just move it out
1 6
Samuel
Conclusion: react context is good actually and pushes you towards good code. You just need a bit of hygiene when using them: mostly just avoid bundling stuff together! pro tip: add a displayName to your contexts so you can tell wtf is happening in your profiler
2 1 26
Samuel
is it a footgun? sorta. but with react context, it's usually a case of "you're holding it wrong". with global state managers, it's impossible to *not* hold it wrong. don't make stuff global!
3 16
Safwan Parkar
so if i understood this right, the idea is to keep state local to each "component"? by component i don't necessarily mean the actual `.tsx` file, but just the particular module or something. i'm still figuring out frontend lol
1 2
Samuel
@samuel.fm
well - if you need to share data between components, lift it out of the component to their shared parent. most of the time you want to keep it as “low” as possible, and only move it to the top of the tree as a last resort. this keeps things simple
1 5