Samuel
@samuel.fm
sure but it’s an aturi so an app that doesn’t know about atproto wouldn’t be able to do anything with it anyway
2 4
Matthieu 🦋Samuelthat makes sense to me
2 4
devin ivy 🐋i am all application/json! pretty sure the at:// in the href will do what we need here. there is a reason we don't encounter these funky +json mime types ubiquitously as everyday devs. the interop story there is not as friendly as one might expect!
1 12
Barry DorransYea, baking in the type seems extraneous.
Of course now you also need a blob mime type, as those don't have types :)
webbeefaturi need to become real URIs first... github.com/bluesky-soci...
ATProto docs misleadingly claim at:// identifiers are IETF RFC-3986 compliant · Issue #417 · bluesky-social/atproto-website
This page on your website, found here in this repo, describes the at:// identifier scheme and makes two specific claims about its relationship to standards: You claim at:// is not compliant with th...
github.com
