Samuel
I find the Dorsey interview fascinating because his issue with Bluesky seems to be mostly vibes-based. He wants ultra-pro-free-speech vibes, and thought a protocol-based app would produce that, whereas we've ended up in a situation where borderline unmoderated X is actually the place he wants to be
51 196 1.4k
stellz
I mean, people can say a lot of controversial stuff on here without outright getting banned, mostly labeled, if you're the type to enjoy pvp mode social media what's a little "Intolerance" label? they don't even have to see it
1 3 52
Samuel
exactly! and you totally could run a parallel AppView that ignores the account-level takedowns, but as Paul said good luck getting that on the app store haha
Samuel@samuel.fm· 9 May 2024
Bluesky - well more specifically atproto - *is* everything he wanted, but to him the vibes are off. So back to X he goes
1 3 36
shreyan (wise)
I mean. Ultimately I think that would be a good thing to have. I don't really like the control app stores have at all. So jack wasn't 100% wrong. I do think Bluesky's greatest strength *is* the ability to have sensible decentralized moderation
1 11
Samuel
@samuel.fm
I hope someone does make one as a proof of concept. it would be interesting
1 11